The Answer To Holiness
(leaned on, relied on You,and were confident)
and You delivered them।
Pay very close attention to the implications in this verse, especially  since what is says is so rare in Old Testament  literature. While we find dozens of uses of the verb batach exhorting and commanding trust in God,  there are less than a hand-full of verses that actually say the people of Israel  did trust in God. This verse is one of those rare occasions.
We are so used to the idea that Israel trusted God that we fail to  recognize that most of the uses of bathach describe cases  of false trust.  Batach  certainly means, “to feel secure, to be unconcerned, to rely on someone or  something,” but most of the time we find that people find security in  the wrong things. The very short list includes wealth, households, military  might, political alliances, other people, religious rituals and, last but  certainly not least, ourselves. The Bible puts it quite plainly. Anyone who  places security in these things will become double-minded. Disappointment stands  in the wings, ready to jump to center stage.
Actually, all human  experience confirms this Biblical truth. There is simply no security in this world.  If we are foolish enough to trust in what the world has to offer as substitutes  for the divine, we will discover, sooner or later, that we made a terrible  mistake. Nevertheless, in spite of universal human affirmation, we go right on  placing our trust in the list of Biblical errors. Money, power, influence and  even intimacy, become welcomed substitutes for real security. Since we all know  better, but we go right ahead acting like fools(and then bemoaning the tragedy  that follows), we must ask the obvious question: why are we so  gullible?
Let me declare that the answer is in this verse; not in what is  says but what it implies. This verse does not say that the fathers  trusted in God because He delivered them.  It says that they trusted God, and (as  a result of that trust) they were delivered. What is the difference? This is the  critical observation. If I trust God because I believe that He will do  such-and-such, then my faith is not really in God but in the subsequent  action He will  perform on my behalf. In other words, I have faith in His deeds, not “IN HIM”.  But if I trust God simply for Who He is, then He can respond in grace and mercy  toward me. Why? Because I have learned to trust a person, not an action. I have  discovered that I can have an intimate, secure relationship based on His character. I do not  need to see Him act in order to know that He is reliable. The reason why we are  constantly persuaded into placing our trust in the list of false security is  that we are still looking for action items. We have not  stepped forward in faith and anchored our lives in the character of God. We do  not understand what it means for God to be holy. We think of God in terms of  actions. Our vocabulary reflects this when we are asked to describe the message  of the Bible in a single word and we come up with “love,” or “mercy,” or  “forgiveness.” Very few of us would first think of “holy.” We are  geared toward God’s acts (and taught to think like this) rather than toward  God’s being.
Psalm 78:22 complains  that the father did not trust God. This is the typical occasion. Which use of  bathach  describes you? 
Comments
Whenever "A MAN of GOD" takes a stand as you have(Please Continue this great effort in Publishing GOD'S WORD)the enemy is furious and wants it to cease.
Always separate the Wheat from the Chaff and CONTINUE IN HIS SERVICE, and thank you for your Biblical Teachings, according to God's Word.